In Peaslee, the Court found that Section 506(a)(1), rather than the Section 1325(a)(9) Hanging Paragraph, governs the treatment of the secured claim of a motor vehicle financer, even though the debtor has purchased a replacement motor vehicle within 910 days of the filing of their petition for personal use, where: (1) it is shown that the secured claim includes amounts loaned to the debtor to pay off the debtor’s negative equity in a trade-in vehicle, not to pay any part of the actual purchase price of the replacement vehicle, so that not all of the debt included in the secured claim is secured by a purchase money security interest; and (2) the Court, on all of the facts and circumstances presented in these refinancing of negative equity cases, in the exercise of its discretion, as specifically provided for by Section 9-103(h) of the New York Uniform Commercial Code, determined that a transformation rather than a dual status rule would be in the best interests of all of the parties and the Bankruptcy System.
Date of decision: 12/22/06
Sunday, December 9, 2007
In re Peaslee, Case No: 2006 WL 3759476 06-21200
Posted by Rachel Lynn Foley at 11:48 AM
Labels: 1325(a)(9), 2nd Circuit, 506(a)(1), 910 vehicle, hanging paragraph, negative equity, WDNY
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment